Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Soskin's avatar

Or for real economists in America, the implicit public policy has been that Dem Presidents can't pass any programs unless they are totally paid for (no matter how it improves the U.S. economy and quality of life) from Federal spending cuts of equal size; but when every incompetent (except Bush 41) GOP President comes in, they spend like drunken sailors (as well as undoing every Dem President's achievements). Secondly, the Federal Reserve monetary policy has dominated fiscal policy for decades because the GOP will no longer vote for new fiscal spending (only cuts for folks who pay taxes) to pull us out of recessions, even spending for most basic, win-win spending (crumbling infrastructure including electrical grids, IRS audits, deep sea oil platform or food inspection, FEMA, CDC, toxic waste dump cleanup, food stamps). But GOP themselves crippled the Fed by meddling with their "independence," pressuring against interest rate hikes when (as now) inflationary expectations may return U.S. to stagflation of 50 years ago (inflation so economically painful to squeeze out).

THE RESOLUTE MIND's avatar

Great graphic! "...the Federal Reserve System has allowed itself to become subservient to fiscal policy..." Allowed? It seems that America's democratically elected 'spendthrift' Congress gave the FED an impossible mandate (mission): maximum employment and stable prices, despite the FED's toolbox of creative monetary policies. What would a reasonable short-term and/or long-term alternative course have looked like?

No posts

Ready for more?